Public process?

Interesting news regarding the Port of Seattle's North Bay development scheme and the impact upon the scheme should three new Port Commissioners win the upcoming election. Meanwhile, the Port has asked that the public comment for the Master Draft Plan be completed by May 26.

Do you feel/sense the noise of spinning wheels? We, the public, take time to study proposals, we attend meetings in good faith, with the belief that our positions will be heard, or considered openly, and then all is up for grabs after the election. Where is the vision of duly elected officials?

I will be looking for clear statements from the candidates. For any project development, sound financial guidelines need to be stated. During the Comprehensive Plan development, several years ago, it was determined that the area would only be for true maritime-industrial development/uses. So, clear financial commitments and no back pedaling about the zoning.

I agree with incumbent Commissioner Lawrence Malloy, who stated that "there were plenty of places we can do hi-tech," referring to sites in Renton, Tukwila, Belltown, Pioneer Square and South Lake Union. While it appears that the marine-industrial sector is not currently in a dynamic growth pattern, are we so shortsighted that we will give away maritime public property for other uses?

The Port states that they do not necessarily have the required abilities to do development projects. Surely they could find developers who would love to have their name attached to a truly visionary development plan. I am not suggesting a public/private partnership with such a developer. I am suggesting that, if the Port would clearly state a vision of their public purpose, a developer and financial experts would be willing and eager to work with them in furthering their clearly stated goals.

This clarity I describe is sorely lacking. And yet they expect us to continue to participate in their public process. It is time to call their bluff.[[In-content Ad]]